Skip to main content

The Writing Passion Is There for a Purpose--Use it!

Are writers (and other artists for the matter) made or born? In my opinion, real writers are born. Writer Lauren Sapala believes similarly to this and talks about it in her article, “What You Were Born To Do”. She talks about how crucial it is for the writer to use his/her gift since not to do so can lead to serious consequences, most of them mental health in nature. Not that this necessarily means that insanity would be the result, but the consequences could be unhealthy depression rising from resentment. Why would born artists (which includes writers, painters, musicians, and even game creators) not create? Because society, especially here in the U.S., makes it appear that creativity is not a practical occupation. Bull shit. Such an illusion is especially so with fiction writing. It's just a story of untrue events, unless it makes Best Seller money, time shouldn't be given to writing that novel, say the mainstream pragmatists. They also say "Get a real job!" So what the hell is a real job? Working at a desk in a high rise fooling people into thinking they can only bank at this particular bank because it's the best of all banks in the world?

There's an urge, an inner motive, for the artist to do his/her work. This urge is more often than not innate rather than learned. To not follow through with it is just about as bad as self-amputating your hands because you won’t do anything with them.

Many of us artists and writers have to create because it's what we were meant to do. And, yes, it is practical. It's practical because, for one thing, it's soothing for the mind and soul and so it’s satisfying for one's self. For another thing, everybody likes to get away from everyday reality, from everyday routine. Everybody, artists and non-artists, like to see what other people have to go through that most of us wouldn't want to go through. Nobody wants to be marooned on an uninhabited island hundreds of miles from any mainland. But many of us want to see how other people deal with this kind of situation. We don't and should not want to see real people land in such situations, and so the safe way to get our entertainment is to look at these experiences through fiction in whatever medium: literature, TV, film, live theatre, etc.

Another practicality that fiction writing has is that it helps readers better deal with their own problems by making them see their lives in a different light. There are all kinds of ways fiction can do this. In horror it may make a person think, “My life isn't as bad as I've thought it to be.” In fantasy it might make a reader realise, “If the hero can work through a problem such as slaying a nearly invincible dragon then I can deal with my own boss at work.” In romance, the main character dealing with her problems may give comfort and hope to the reader in dealing with a break-up.

Not everybody wants to write these stories. Many people hate writing because it is hard work. It is extremely difficult work that the majority of us writers do not get paid enough for. Yet we do it because we like it, because we have an unending urge to create. Somebody has to do it because somebody's going to want to read stories. So why should it not be us who have a born passion for it regardless of how much money it pays? The passion is there for a purpose or else it wouldn’t be there. So I say this to my fellow writers and artists: use your passion because it was meant to be used; to hell with what the pragmatic majority says. We’re providing their entertainment and escape from their everyday, boring lives.

So can you honestly say a person can make him/herself into a passionate writer?



Comments

  1. I completely agree. There is an innate drive that writers/artists/musicians have that cannot be taught; it's either there or it isn't. It's just too bad that many people do not appreciate how much work that drive pushes us to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps it's because so many people who don't have that drive themselves have a harder time understanding our roles as artists. And it's probably a problem here in the U.S. more than it is in many other parts of the world, such as Europe, because the U.S. is so commercially and profit oriented which obscures the importance of art for art's sake. Not that we artists shouldn't get paid for our work; we should. But the emphasis on profit is overdone here.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

4 Space Opera Books That’s Heroes Will Remind You of Han Solo

Credit: Pixabay.com No doubt that there’s been some big Star Wars news this week! Friday was the 41st anniversary of the first Star Wars movie, A New Hope , and so the birthday of the entire franchise. The day before, Solo: A Star Wars Story released in theatres. I haven’t seen this new Star Wars film yet but plan to tomorrow. But in celebration of the new movie I thought it would be neat to list four of my favourite space opera books that’s central characters share the same swashbuckling, rogue archetype as the Han Solo character does. Han Solo’s archetype, or primal character-type, combines traits of the cowboy, the pirate and the wandering adventurer. Characters who have these traits are often loners of a sort, are daring and don’t let the law stop them from doing what they feel they have to. Often the legal system that they defy is one that is set up by a corrupt establishment and, in the case of space operas, that establishment is often an empire. Even tho...