Skip to main content

My Upcoming Book: “Circa Sixty Years Dead” Will Have 2 Covers

If you’re like me and love highly imaginative art, you probably enjoy the hand-painted  sci fi and fantasy book cover art of the 1980s and back. As a pre-reading ritual, you may stare several seconds, or maybe even minutes, at the beautiful art on the cover of that paperback you picked up at a used book store. And it’s nothing to be embarrassed about because the illustration is part of the art of the book as a whole. It served a commercial function which was to draw in customers to buy the book, but if it was made by a great artist such as Frank Frazetta or Boris Vallejo, it has an aesthetic appeal too. It makes you think about the world the story takes place in before you start reading it. It makes you want to explore that world on the other side of the front cover, just like with a carnival haunted house’s (or dark ride’s) front with its mural of monsters. Those books are from a time when individual artists did illustrations for book covers and whose work was distinct. You could tell a Frazetta book cover from a Vallejo one, a Vallejo one from a Dillon one and vice versa.

The exterior of a dark ride at a carnival.
The illustration on a speculative fiction book cover is a lot like the front exterior of a dark ride in a carnival midway: It gives you an idea of what you'll meet inside.
Photo Credit: Pixabay


Sadly, those days are over. As I’m sure you know, there has been a rise of the photographic book cover. Except for a small percentage, these covers tend not to be very distinct in their styles. This takeover is both due to society’s obsession with the Hollywood blockbuster and the convenience of today’s digital technology, especially Photoshop-like software. Not only do readers want a photographic cover because of their inclination towards television and internet video realism so exemplary in reality TV, but publishers and self-publishers want to give them it because it’s easier and cheaper to make.

But there’s a small niche of us who still have an appreciation for and an attraction to hand-produced book cover illustrations. Rather than wanting to see what is mostly a photographic reproduction of the real world, that niche wants to see the artist’s world as much as the writer’s the art depicts on the cover. However, we all have our preferences and so I want to be fair to everyone. So I’m releasing my short-read book, “Circa Sixty Years Dead”, in two editions: a hand-produced cover illustration edition and a photographic cover illustration edition.

I’d like to discuss the aesthetic value of hand-illustrated book cover art some more, but I don’t have the time to do it now. I still have my manuscript to put together, let alone the cover. These are on top of my other writing projects. But here’s a link to an article that discusses the topic in really good detail: “The Decline and Fall of the Book Cover”, Tim Kreider.

Right now, I want to make sure you know about a special offer I’m making for you: upon its release I’m giving away copies of the hand illustrated cover edition of “Circa Sixty Years Dead” for free. However, I’m only doing it for one day. I said last time that I would be releasing the book at the beginning of next month. However, I want to give you a chance to comment on the cover and so will have a cover reveal first. So I’m moving the release to the middle of the month although I’m not sure to what day yet. But you can be the first to know by subscribing to my blog on the subscription form towards the bottom of the side bar to the right.

Next week I’ll have a book cover concept sketch for you to give me your comments on then after that the reveal of the final, hand-produced, illustration. By then (two weeks from today) I should have the precise release date of the book and maybe the date for the photograph cover edition as well.

Until next time . . .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least