Skip to main content

Gaiman and McGinnis restore the human touch to book cover art

I apologise for not posting last week. I started a new day job and so it put me back in my writing schedule. But now Iā€™ve returned to the night job here at the Fantastic Site once again!

A few weeks ago I was at Crocker Con talking to a friend, Chris Wisnia creator of the Doris Danger comic book series. The series commemorates comic book creator Jack Kirbyā€™s art of the 1970s while spoofing 1950s and ā€˜60s atomic sci fi monsters. Anyway, I told him that one of the comic books I read over the summer was an issue from Neil Gaimanā€™s Sandman storyline from 2014, Overture. He told me he just finished reading Gaimanā€™s award winning novel, American Gods. I said I havenā€™t read that one yet because I normally donā€™t have the attention span for a 500-plus page novel. (The last one that I read was David Copperfield, which, as great as it is, took me over a year to read because I was reading other books simultaneously.) But I told him that Iā€™ll probably read it as an excuse to buy the new Robert McGinnis cover edition. McGinnis used to paint the illustrations for early pulp fiction magazines and paperbacks, including the James Bond series. And so Iā€™m using this excuse for two reasons: 1) Because McGinnis painted the cover art rather than digitally produced it; 2) The style is that of the late 1960s to early ā€˜70s. Though Neil himself says that ā€œIn my head . . . it's probably from about 1971...ā€  Close enough, since that was a transitional period between two eras.

Robert McGinnis Book Cover for Neil Gaiman's American Gods.
American Gods, Robert McGinnis cover edition
Credit: Amazon/William Morrow


The McGinnis edition of American Gods is now available. Neil plans to release several more of his titles with book cover art by McGinnis because, as he says, he is a lover of the old school paperbacks and loves the book cover art for its beautiful, hand-painted technique. He also says that itā€™s of a style of book cover art we rarely get any more. I agree with Neil, totally.

Too many people want realism in images now and so want believability in the technical sense. That photo-realism comes easier than ever with todayā€™s computer technology, which I personally believe humanity has become too damn dependent on like a doper with drugs. This love of the photo sensual as opposed to the aesthetic high of hand-produced art, has been exploited by the corporate system, a system that I confess to being partly guilty of giving into myself in order to sell my own books. But, I havenā€™t sold out without offering the option of a hand-produced book cover illustration which was the case with ā€œCirca Sixty Years Deadā€. In about a month or so, before the holiday rush, Iā€™ll have committed the sin of hypocrisy for ā€œCirca Sixty Yearsā€, or more like half-hypocrisy because Iā€™ll still be offering the hand-produced book cover art edition alongside the digitally produced one.

But I support Neilā€™s and McGinnisā€™s return to hand-produced book cover art, because itā€™s helping bring back the humanity in art which has been taken over by the machine and the drive to make money. If you want to support a return to hand-produced art and youā€™re a Gaiman or McGinnis fan like me, then you may want to purchase the new paperback edition of American Gods. If you want to go a 16th of a mile further, then purchase ā€œCirca Sixty Yearsā€ which you can get a hell of a lot less than American Gods but thatā€™s because itā€™s on Kindle, though I plan to offer a print edition soon. So, yes the book is digital, and Iā€™ll admit, the art is digitally reproduced, but the cover art is a photo of a hand-produced illustration the exception being the black background and some touch-ups (mainly around the edges of the statue which really runs into the digital black background). So the reason why I say you would be going the extra 16th of a mile is because the cover art isnā€™t completely hand-produced but also because Iā€™m not Neil Gaiman. Hence, my book on kindle is only 99 cents.

How much humanity would you say is left in todayā€™s book cover art, most of which is digitally produced?

Until next time . . .




Book cover depicting a six-armed goddess statue.
Available Now At Amazon!





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: Stephen Kingā€™s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan donā€™t read a lot of Stephen Kingā€™s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally wonā€™t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I donā€™t read a lot of Kingā€™s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King itā€™s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections Iā€™ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least...

Book-To-Movie: ā€˜The Hound of the Baskervillesā€™

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  Iā€™ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyleā€™s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What Iā€™ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyleā€™s novel, ā€œThe Hound of the Baskervillesā€, definitely contains these elements. Itā€™s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as Iā€™m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that Iā€™ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic...

Return to Fiction Writing; Graphic Novel Based on Lost Horror Film

Credit: Wikimedia Commons Some of you may had noticed that I skipped posting back on the 4th of the month, as far as Monday posting goes. I posted for the IWSG blog hop that Wednesday and it didn't make up for that Monday's missed post since I said I had to keep it short. I had to reduce the writing during that week because, as I also said in that IWSG post, my mom passed away back in October and so that was the week of her funeral. I just got back on track earlier last week (Wednesday I think it was) and so that included returning to working on my fiction projects, namely my upcoming short story collection, "Bad Apps". Needless to say, I'm back on track with my weekly blog posts. So, I have some about my latest progress on "Bad Apps" and, in sci fi/fantasy news, about an upcoming graphic novel adaptation of a lost silent horror film that starred Lon Chaney Sr. Back On Track with ā€˜Bad Appsā€™ My short hiatus from my fiction writing wasn't really a ful...