Skip to main content

Generic Verb Vs. Brand Verb

The logo for the Insecure Writer's Support Group with a light house in the background.


It’s time for another Insecure Writers Support Group (IWSG) post! Every first Wednesday of the month we writers bring our writing challenges and problems out into the open to share with each other and try to come up with solutions.


The IWSG question of the month is "What's the strangest thing you've ever googled in researching a story?" Before I answer that question, I'm going to make a change in the wording of it but the meaning will be essentially the same. So, to rephrase the question: What's the strangest thing you've ever discovered in researching a story on the Internet?

The reason I rephrased the question was because I try not use brand names for verbs like I try not to use them as nouns to refer to a general product. For example, Google is a brand of a search engine, it is not all search engines or just any search engine. This proper noun of a brand name has been casually used as a verb that means to do an internet search. It's similar to using the brand name Coke to refer to all colas or even soda in general.

Google may allow for the casual use of its company name as a verb, and so not bother suing anyone using it in their writing. However, to be more grammatically correct, it is, in my opinion, better to use the generic verb to refer to an action rather than use one derived from a company or product name. It's better to say "searched the Internet" rather than "googled". When you do that, you are relying more on universal and public language rather than on a company's trademarked vocabulary to get your ideas across. It's a kind of creator or writer independence. I'm not trying to judge anyone's writing or vocabulary, I'm just saying what I feel is more liberating as well as grammatically correct language.

Now, finally, to answer the question, what's the strangest thing you've ever discovered in researching a story on the Internet? To tell you the truth, I do so much research on Internet for both my fiction and non-fiction and so have seen so many strange things on it that I cannot say what the strangest has been. I can say that the most unusual thing I've researched on the internet is the decay process of a human corpse. I needed to find out the process for a horror story I was writing one time in order to make the decaying of a victim's corpse over a certain time span believable.

Similarly, for another horror story, I had to research the Internet to find out what the odor of a burnt human corpse was likened to. I never knew this before, but I found out that the odor smells like rotting pork. It's a good thing I don't believe in eating swine meat!


Today’s IWSG is brought to you by these super co-hosts: Sadira Stone, Patricia Josephine, Lisa Buie-Collard, Erika Beebe, and C. Lee McKenzie! IWSG was founded by awesome author Alex Cavanaugh, writer of the Cassa Series of novels!

Until next time . . .

Comments

  1. Living in pig country, I know how bad they smell alive and can only imagine how bad they smell dead.
    There are a lot of words people use that are actually brand names - Kleenex for tissues, Q-Tips for ear swabs, Xerox for copy machine...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! Commercial brand names have gotten into our lexingtons so much, especially here in the U.S., it's all too easy to substitute them for the words that represent the actual things.

      Delete
  2. Have you coked yourself over the head recently? I am going to kleenex the table today. See if I can pampers the baby as well. Oooooh! That got me thinking :) have a great IWSG day!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least