Skip to main content

What We Authors and Artists Can Do in the AI Apocalypse

A watercolor painting depicting a bleak, futuristic city.
Credit: Pixabay


This time, I’m not posting late. As I mentioned at my Facebook page, I'm switching from posting on weekends to during the weekdays. As of now, I’ll be posting Mondays. Google Analytics has been showing me that it's a time many of you prefer and so I want to make the timing as convenient for you as possible. Now for today’s post . . . 


Back in December, the admin of a Facebook writers' group I belong to announced a new rule for the group: no posting of anything done by an AI writer or AI artist. She gave several reasons why. Reasons I mostly agree with, including the jeopardising of writers’ and artists’ careers. Since around that same time, there's been a lot of online controversy over AI content creators which include both writer software and artist software. You'd think most writers and artists (digital and freehand) would be hella angry over this new technology that, basically, does your work for you. Well, I don’t know about most but I can say that many are angry, myself included. 

Yes, there are some writers and artists who actually embrace AI content creator software. Some of them really annoy me, making me feel like they’re selling us out. For instance, according to an article at “The Verge”, one indie author, Jennifer Lepp, uses AI writer software to write her novels and she seems to take it all too lightly, saying her work is “just words . . . So what if a computer wrote them?” My answer: if a computer wrote them then you didn’t write the book! Yet, elsewhere in the article, she talks about how the software can basically doom writers when it advances in the future! 

Sure, like with just about any technology, an AI writer can perhaps have some things that can help a human writer without taking over their whole job. But relying totally on it, as we’ve already done with too much computer technology, is suicidal to our careers. The content made by this software has been selling and publishing both via the indie route as well as the traditional publishing one. However, it’s not only destroying our careers and value as writers. It’s also destroying the relationship between us human writers and readers. 

The most popular AI writer software right now is ChatGPT by the tech research company, OpenAI. According to AI analyst Alberto Romero, ChatGPT is the most intelligent, most human-like, chatbot to date, one that can write your content for you. And, of course, many big businesses will, if they haven’t already, take advantage of it. They’re always looking to save money and make bigger profits all at human beings' expenses, including human content creators’. 

It's obvious that, as with almost any other technology going as far back as the Industrial Revolution, AI creator software can put human creators out of work. But it does much more than that. For one, it takes away human creators' meaning in life. Creativity is what many of us artists and writers were born with and meant to use. We were meant to distribute our work (including selling it) to society, to our fellow human beings. When AI writing and art are chosen over those by human beings, it's wasting those human beings’ creative skills and talents causing the two to stagnate, to get put and locked away in the closet, if you will. AI creator software does this because it makes the content it puts out too easy to access and so a lot cheaper. The majority of people are going to go for the cheapest art and literature they can get. 

Another thing AI creator software does, and perhaps even more significantly, is cut off the connection between human creator and human audience. When a person purchases an AI-produced work, an anti-social attitude in the consumption of that work develops. The work only fulfills that person's desires who has no concern for the one who created it because the creator is a machine, a non-living entity. So, that person has no sense of a fellow human having produced the work. 

So, what do we human creators do during this time of AI apocalypse, or AIpocalypse? We do what every group of people whose rights have been violated do: campaign for human writer and artists' rights. We boycott computer produced art and we support our human creators by consuming their work. Or we go underground. What I mean by that is that if the majority won't buy our creations, we buy each other’s creations as well as sell them to those people who appreciate our work for being made by human beings like themselves. 

Maybe the dawn of the AIpocalypse can't be stopped. But we human creators, no matter how small in number on this technology infested planet, can still support each other in our work either monetarily or with encouragement. 


Are you bothered by AI writer or artist software?

Until next time . . . 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

4 Space Opera Books That’s Heroes Will Remind You of Han Solo

Credit: Pixabay.com No doubt that there’s been some big Star Wars news this week! Friday was the 41st anniversary of the first Star Wars movie, A New Hope , and so the birthday of the entire franchise. The day before, Solo: A Star Wars Story released in theatres. I haven’t seen this new Star Wars film yet but plan to tomorrow. But in celebration of the new movie I thought it would be neat to list four of my favourite space opera books that’s central characters share the same swashbuckling, rogue archetype as the Han Solo character does. Han Solo’s archetype, or primal character-type, combines traits of the cowboy, the pirate and the wandering adventurer. Characters who have these traits are often loners of a sort, are daring and don’t let the law stop them from doing what they feel they have to. Often the legal system that they defy is one that is set up by a corrupt establishment and, in the case of space operas, that establishment is often an empire. Even tho...