I hope everybody had a good Thanksgiving. Mine was groovy. I
just spent it with the family, which is good enough for me. I was sure to look
out for giant man-eating turkeys and I hope everybody else did too. It was a super
day of giving thanks for the many good things we have, which is often a lot
more than we think. So many people think too much about what they don’t have. Some
think they don’t have enough money, enough friends, enough recognition . . . The
list can go on. But you can add to that list that some feel there’s not enough high
quality science fiction literature out there. That may be true to some extent. One
person who feels that sci fi literature for the past two decades has been poor,
in the science part particularly, has a website out that addresses the problem.
That website is called Atomic Rockets
which you can check out at http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/.
It is a resource for both science fiction writers as well as readers who want
accurate science in the genre. And because the website emphasizes plausible sci
fi like that of the atomic era’s classic authors, such as Heinlein and Asimov,
it also serves as a good resource for atompunk lovers.
Photo Credit: Winchell Chung/Atomic Rockets |
Origin and Mission
Atomic Rockets’
mission is to go scientifically accurate where no science fiction writer seems
to have been going the last two decades. At least web administrator and site
founder, Winchell Chung, says it’s been that long. Disappointed about today’s
science fiction literature lacking scientific plausibility and accuracy, he
created the site hoping to draw more authors to use it as a resource. “I have
been quite disappointed in the SF novels that have come out in the last couple
of decades,” he says on the site’s homepage. “In particular, the scientific accuracy was abysmal. So this website is part of
my master plan, to give a resource to SF authors that will assist them in
getting the science correct.” He feels that good science fiction gets its
science right like Robert Heinlein did with his stories. So his site consists
of pages of scientific and technological facts that explain how works of science
fiction reflect or lack reflecting these facts. He writes his articles in a
manner of testing scientific theories on the stories. In fact, his site started
off as one that specialised in the equations of rocket science but then grew “to
encompass other topics of interest to SF authors and game designers.”
An Atompunk Resource
But Atomic Rockets
is not just a textbook for people who want to make their sci fi plausible. Chung
is a big atompunk fan (only he calls it “rocketpunk”) and so features several
articles about the sci fi of the 1940s through ‘60s. Within these are images of
paperback book and pulp magazine covers with colourful art depicting space-suited
heroes encountering both humanoid and inhuman-looking aliens and deadly robots.
There is even a page dedicated to atompunk, entitled “Rocketpunk andMacgruffinite”, that consists of a good sized article about the subgenre so I highly recommend
you check it out.
Atomic Rocket Approved Reading
Because Chung takes high quality science fiction seriously,
most of the books his site discusses are the harder sci fi. He rates these with
a seal called the “Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval”. He has two main book lists
for these works: one is a page dedicated to books by authors who have told him that his website helped them produce
scientifically accurate work; the other is a section of a separate page that lists books approved with the seals but whose authors have
not claimed using the site to produce their work but who still get the science
right. So if you’re looking for high quality science fiction to read, like
yours truly always does, then consider the books on these two lists for
building your own to-read lists.
Atomic Rockets is
a must resource for both writers of science fiction who want to make their
stories as believable as possible and for readers looking for recommended high
quality sci fi reading. It’s also a great
resource for lovers of atompunk, a subgenre that seems to lack coverage on the
internet. So atompunkers, bookmark this one in your Favorites list too. I did!
I’ll try to explain more in-depth about Atomic Rockets next time. But for now, think about this question:
Do you think today’s science fiction literature has become more scientifically
accurate or less? Please fill free to leave your answers in the box below.
Until next time . . .
nice
ReplyDeleteThanks. Did you check out the site yet (Atomic Rockets)? There's a lot of neat stuff there.
Delete