Skip to main content

Book-To-Movie: Poe’s ‘The Pit and the Pendulum’

 

An ink illustration depicting a pendulum descending on a man bound to the floor as rats surround him.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons /Arthur Rackham

Warning: This review may contain spoilers. 

It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Normally, we do a Book-To-Movie every fourth weekend of the month. However, because it was necessary for me to make a sudden change of story and movie for review, I had to postpone this month’s post in the series to this fifth weekend. My apologies.


This month’s book and movie review is Edgar Allen Poe’s short story, “The Pit and the Pendulum” and the 1961 movie adaptation directed by Roger Corman and starring Vincent Price. I truly believe that no one can adapt any of Poe’s gothic horror stories to film in a way that does those stories justice. However, many of Corman’s films come close to doing so. One of his best adaptations of Poe’s short stories is “The Pit and the Pendulum”. Why this movie adapts Poe’s short story so well is mostly due to the tension and surreal style of filming. 



'The Pit and the Pendulum' Short Story

This is one of Poe’s scariest and most intense tales. The protagonist is the narrator, who, as with many of author’s narrating protagonists, is not named. The story begins with the narrator having been brought to a trial in the Spanish Inquisition in which the judges condemn him to a torturous death. He soon finds himself on a block of stone that rises from a deep pit. Above hangs a pendulum that soon descends toward him. He does everything in his power to escape but escape is seemingly hopeless. He manages to free himself from his bindings but there is nothing bridging the pit and so he has no way off without falling to his death. Things get even worse when the metallic walls turn scorching hot and move towards him pushing him closer to the block’s edge. 


This tale is more of a an in-the-moment experience than it is a full story that connects the main character with a background. Again, we are not given his name. We also are not told why he has been brought before the Inquisition. It’s a story that seems to be about an isolated event and so a story without any surrounding context. Which in this case is a good thing. That’s because the story is about isolation. The protagonist has no one, for the most part, advocating for him. He is first brought before his black cloaked judges and oppressors and then finds himself alone, with only rats nearby, in the darkened pendulum chamber on a block of stone in the middle of a seemingly bottomless pit. In this and other ways, the story has a dream-like, surreal quality. The narrator’s whole existence is as if it’s apart from all humanity and in some sort of hell. 


The Movie

Corman’s movie adaptation of “The Pit and the Pendulum”, like his other adaptations of Poe’s fiction, expands on the original story. Because the original story is a short tale and the movie a full-length feature, scenes and characters are added. Even so, he follows the original story’s basic plot well. In this version, the protagonist is Francis Barnard (played by John Kerr) who travels from England to Spain to pay his respects to his recently deceased sister, Elizabeth, the late wife of Don Nicholas Medina (Vincent Price). When he arrives at the Medina estate, a broken-up Don Medina tells him that Elizabeth died of a disease. However, Barnard doesn’t believe him and so suspects him of being behind her death. Later he learns that Elizabeth died of fright of the castle due to its horrible history but even this he doesn’t believe.


The horrible history of the castle? Don Medina’s father was an Inquisitionist. Medina claims to be cursed by the evil his father did to the Inquisition victims in the torture chamber that lies under the family’s castle. He also believes to be haunted by the ghost of his late wife (played by ‘60s scream queen Barbara Steele).

 

Like many of Corman’s horror movies, the ending is ironic and the characters aren’t who they at first seem to be and end up betraying friends and loved ones. Not only does the ghost of Don Medina’s wife come back to haunt him but the spirit of his own father comes back to possess him. This and betrayal lead to an attempted murder by pendulum toward the end. 


The tension of the film is built up well like that of the original short story. Only instead of that tension coming from one character, it comes from two: Don Medina and Barnard. It comes from Don Medina when he thinks he is going mad from the guilt he feels for his father’s tormenting of innocent victims and from himself believing that he may had unknowingly killed his own wife by entombing her alive. We also learn that when Medina was a child he witnessed his mother’s murder by his father in the torture chamber. The tension also comes from Barnard because of his suspicion of Medina and his ambition to find out the truth about his sister’s death. The conflict between the two characters itself raises that tension even more. 


Many of Corman’s Poe films are filmed in a surreal style conveying Poe’s manner of storytelling. “Pit and the Pendulum” is definitely one of these films. Of the gothic settings and scenes in this movie, the pendulum chamber is the most gothic and terrifying and rightfully so. After all, at least as far as settings go, it’s the black heart of the movie. As the pendulum is lowered toward its victim, in this case Barnard, a continuous mural of black cloaked, Inquisitionists lines the chamber, the figures seeming to glare with their red, demonic eyes down at him. These figures seem to replace the Inquisitionists that are present at the beginning of Poe’s story. The images of the eyes themselves are taken from those in the original story that also stare from the walls at the victim only the figures the eyes belong to are vague to the narrator.  


The surrealism is also generated from the dream-like sequences in the film. These sequences are filmed in a darkened, monochromatic colour, such as green, and are tilted at odd angles—very characteristic of Corman’s horror movies. With imagery such as the mural of black robed figures and the dream-like sequences, the movie conveys the surrealistic style of Poe really good.


Other Movie Adaptations of ‘The Pit’

There have been several other movie adaptations of “The Pit and the Pendulum” both before and after Corman’s. Many of them have either been made by other countries and not released in U.S. theatres or have been made for TV. The latest U.S. movie adaptation for the big screen was a 1991 version that was actually produced in collaboration with Italian producers. I haven’t seen this adaptation but it seems to be more historical-oriented and focuses more on a Spanish witch prosecution. 



There cannot be another Edgar Allan Poe in any medium of storytelling whether prose fiction, film, live theatre or whatever else. His work and style cannot be reproduced because it is too much from his own mentality. However, Corman conveys that style best in which the way he conveys it is a style of his own. Still, the movie can’t substitute for the original prose work. I’ll always prefer to read the original story over watching the film, but the film is one that I would have on my DVD shelf like a book of Poe’s short stories is on my book shelf.

Have you read Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Pit and the Pendulum”? Have you seen any of the movie adaptations?

Until next time . . .


Comments

  1. I've read the story and seen the Corman film years ago. (Can't miss a film with Vincent Price in it.) Definitely one of Corman's better films, as by the 80's they were mostly B- at best.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least