Skip to main content

We Need the Humour of ‘60s Sitcom ‘The Munsters’

A photo of Fred Gwynne and Yvonne De Carlo as Herman and Lily Munster.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons


All this week I’ve been trying to catch up on my writing projects, especially my upcoming short story collection. I had lost a lot of writing time while I was in the hospital for several weeks. So for the past week I’ve been mostly writing the first draft of a story I want to include in the book. I’ll keep you updated on the collection but in this post I want to talk about Rob Zombie’s upcoming movie reboot of the 1960s sitcom, “The Munsters”. And I can tell you right now that I probably won’t be seeing it when it releases. 


Some of you, especially if you’re a fan of popular movie monsters of the mid 20th century like me, are probably familiar with “The Munsters”. It was a TV sitcom about a family based on some of Universal’s classic monsters such as Frankenstein’s monster and Dracula. The series ran from 1964 to 66. During that same year that it was canceled, a movie directly based on it called “Munster, Go Home” released in theatres. In later decades, a few made-for-TV movies based on the sitcom came out and then in the late ‘80s a series reboot was syndicated titled “The Munsters Today”. 

As you may have heard, Rob Zombie, the director of violent and gory horror films such as “The Devil’s Rejects”, is planning to direct his own movie based on “The Munsters”. There’s been a lot of controversy around it because “The Munsters” TV show was about a loving family of monsters who, although had their strange ways, never hurt anyone even though people naturally feared them because of their looks. 

I was reading another blogger’s article that praised the upcoming movie for the gory and violent details that many anticipate being in it. I found this so dishonoring toward a show that brought so much good-hearted humour and optimism to audiences in an era that was itself generally optimistic. So I responded to the post as quoted below. Some changes I made were the omitting of typos and information irrelevant to this post, and correction of a misspelling. (Boy, I hate auto correction!).


"We all have a right to our own preferences and I respect yours. I, myself, definitely do Munsters and I definitely do not do Rob Zombie.  . . . In this time of violence, pervasion perversion of culture, and out-right hatred, we need optimism similar to that of the era that The Munsters was born out of. While it spoofed the darkness of classic horror films, it broke the stereotype of monsters by depicting the family as loving. I'm not saying Rob Zombie's films are bad (although I never liked them), but I am saying that I don't see him doing near the job that the original Munsters series did, a job so badly needed today. That said, I don't see his version being much more than a movie with simply the Munsters logo and title attached to it. I'll be skipping that one."


We’re in an age where Hollywood perverts past culture. It does so because so much of society demands it, especially US society. People in this country like to be shocked by the content in film and television rather than be delighted by good storytelling in the two. The shock includes graphic violence, disgusting acts such as peeing in public, and the down-talking toward groups of real-life people. They have no concern for how the other characters or people in real life will get hurt. As long as it gives them the satisfaction of shock, that’s all they care about. Hollywood capitalises off of the desires of audiences no matter how unethical or hurtful those desires are to others. 

“The Munsters” TV series of the ‘60s didn’t do these things. It promoted healthy humour, even if that humour was a little dark (it’s a family of monsters, after all) and an optimistic lifestyle. In a time when masses of people are being shot for senseless reasons and where hate speech is spewed almost everywhere in some form, we need the light-hearted humour of “The Munsters” and the optimism of the time period it grew out of. But with Rob Zombie directing that film, his style of movie-making is very likely to go in a direction that is not “Munsters”. I can’t say for sure because not enough details of the movie have been given yet, but it will probably be only one more that adds to our violent and crude culture. So, most likely, as I said, I’ll be skipping that one. 


Because I’m so behind on my projects, I haven’t been posting too much on my Patreon page either. Because of that, if you join now, for the rest of this month you’ll get free access to past posts that only members can see. 

Fellow writers: What have you been working on? Everyone: Are any of you fans of “The Munsters” and, if so, what do you think of the upcoming Rob Zombie movie? Please feel free to leave your answers in the box below.


Until next time . . . 


Comments

  1. People like to be shocked - exactly. No happy endings, no groups of people actually working together, nothing positive.
    I dig Zombie's music but never felt his films were very good. The Munsters should not be remade as an R-rated gore fest. That's not what it was about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, a gore fest would just take a lot of the humour away among other things.

      Delete
  2. I felt that way about the Dark Shadows film with Johnny Depp that came out a few years back. It didn't understand the heart of what it was playing with, so I never watched more than a preview. I'm with you about the humor of the Munsters and Zombie seeming like a poor combo. @samanthabwriter from
    Balancing Act

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't gotten around to seeing the Dark Shadows film. I watched a few episodes a long time ago but haven't seen enough to compare the series to the movie. I'll probably have to watch some more before seeing the film. It would be interesting to see how much the movie differs from the series.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

4 Space Opera Books That’s Heroes Will Remind You of Han Solo

Credit: Pixabay.com No doubt that there’s been some big Star Wars news this week! Friday was the 41st anniversary of the first Star Wars movie, A New Hope , and so the birthday of the entire franchise. The day before, Solo: A Star Wars Story released in theatres. I haven’t seen this new Star Wars film yet but plan to tomorrow. But in celebration of the new movie I thought it would be neat to list four of my favourite space opera books that’s central characters share the same swashbuckling, rogue archetype as the Han Solo character does. Han Solo’s archetype, or primal character-type, combines traits of the cowboy, the pirate and the wandering adventurer. Characters who have these traits are often loners of a sort, are daring and don’t let the law stop them from doing what they feel they have to. Often the legal system that they defy is one that is set up by a corrupt establishment and, in the case of space operas, that establishment is often an empire. Even tho...