Skip to main content

Disney's First Live-Action Horror Film Was Almost Sci-Fi

This movie promotion poster for Disney's "The Watcher in the Woods" depicts the ethereal heads of five people.
Credit: Wikipedia/Disney


Disney has not been typically known for horror movies. However, it’s made a few. When I say “horror”, I don't mean any of Disney’s comedies based on the genre or any of its Mickey mouse haunted house cartoons or monster parodies. So, Eddie Murphy's “The Haunted Mansion” and the “Hocus Pocus” movies don't count here. What I mean by “horror” is straight, live-action horror. I'm also not including today's movies made by Disney-acquired properties such as “Halloween: The Curse of Michael Meyers” which was made by Miramax, or “The Omen” which was produced by 20th Century Fox. I'm talking about horror produced by Disney Studios itself. 

The first Disney horror film made by Disney Studios with live actors and for the big screen was a 1980s movie called "The Watcher in the Woods". It was based on a young adult novel by Florence Engel Randall. I haven't read the novel, so I'm not going to talk about it here. If I would have read it, this post would be a Book-To-Movie. So, for now, we'll just settle for a movie review without the book it was adapted from. Even though “The Watcher in the Woods” was Disney's first live-action, supernatural horror movie, it almost became a science fiction horror movie instead. 


Synopsis

Similar to the novel that it’s based on, “Watcher in the Woods” is about a teenage girl named Jan, who, with her parents and younger sister, move into an old, secluded, English manor they’ve rented. Jan discovers that the ghost of the landlady’s daughter, who had suddenly disappeared several decades before and is a kind of doppelganger to Jan, is haunting her. To stop the haunting, Jan has to find out what caused the disappearance of the landlady's daughter. 

Plot, Setting, Style, and Special Effects

The movie's plot is structured good, timing the events in a way that keeps the viewer in suspense. The setting is an old-fashioned gothic one making it ideal for gothic horror fans like myself. The style is good in that it’s realistic and simplistic like many of Disney’s pre-1985 live-action films were. So, it has no overdone, forced, special effects or visuals like too many of today’s fantasy movies do. Yet, the special effects and visuals that it does use are sufficient while the movie still gets the story across. 

Acting and Characterisation

Most of the acting is a little stale except for Bette Davis’s who was the perfect choice for playing the landlady, Mrs. Aylwood. She makes her character come across as mysterious and morbid, kind of a carry-over from her much darker films such as “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane" and "Burnt Offerings". The overall characterisation is not bad, but the interaction between Jan and her sister is particularly bonding and sympathetic. 

The Ending Scenes

The main problem I had with the movie was its ending. It cut off too soon for it being a Disney film. The main problem in the story is resolved, but there is not much of a denouement afterwards to resolve the remaining, smaller problems. But it originally wasn't flawed like that. A year before it's nationwide release in 1981, "The Watcher in the Woods" was screened on a limited run in New York. It was this version that had more of an extensive ending which didn't only resolve the problem of the haunting but it showed the reuniting of Jan with her family. This ending should have been left in the movie’s nationwide release. But there was also another ending that was filmed but never used. If it had been, the movie would not be supernatural horror.  

This second alternative ending also included the reuniting of Jan with her family. Unlike the first alternative ending, this one features an alien abduction scene that would have debunked the haunting if it would had been used. It would have totally thrown the movie off because what is presented as a supernatural horror story from the beginning suddenly becomes science fiction horror in the end. This would have been misleading to the audience and would be like cheating the gothic horror fans who’d want to see a supernatural thriller.


"The Watcher in the Woods" is a fun, Disney horror film. If it would have been left with the alien invasion scene, it wouldn't have been Disney's first supernatural horror movie for the big screen. 1983’s "Something Wicked This Way Comes" would have been that instead. That's also based on a novel, one by Ray Bradbury. That's a review for another time, and since I've both read the book and seen the movie, it will probably be a Book-To-Movie review rather than just a movie review. Look out for it here sometime in the near future.




Newsletter

I’m currently planning the next edition of my newsletter, “Night Creatures’ Call”. I’ll release it in about a week to two weeks from today. I’ll be discussing where I’m currently at on my upcoming book of short fiction, “Bad Apps”, for which I’ve finally moved on to revising the next story! So if you haven’t subscribe to the newsletter you can do so for free here


Have you seen Disney’s 1980/’81 horror film, “The Watcher in the Woods”? What ending would have you preferred? 

Until next time . . . 


Comments

  1. Be interesting to find the extended ending that ran with the initial limited release. I don't remember the movie well but I do remember the ending not being the most satisfying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think there are some newer DVD and/or Blu Ray versions that include the original ending in the movie. You can probably find one on Amazon or such.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least