Skip to main content

Book-To-Movie: 'Island of Dr. Moreau' & 'Island of Lost Souls'

Promotion poster for the 1932 film, "Island of Lost Souls", depicting a scantily dressed woman and a "beast man" spying on her.
Credit: Wikipedia


Warning: This review contains details that may be considered spoilers by some. 

Even though the fourth Monday of June has passed us, I'm still dedicated to giving you the Book-To-Movie review of the month and so I have it here today. My apologies for missing last week; I had family come from out of town. In a Book-To-Movie (BTM), we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. As far as I’m aware, there have been three movie adaptations of H.G. Wells's novel of science fiction horror, "The Island of Dr. Moreau". I'd like to do a BTM on each, but I thought it would make sense to start with the original first. The others will follow in future BTMs, I just don't have set dates for them yet. The original movie adaptation is the black-and-white 1932 one titled "Island of Lost Souls". The novel "The Island of Dr. Moreau" and movie "Island of Lost Souls" are both sci fi horror, but the former is more about realistic human survival whereas the latter more about romance. 


The Book: 'The Island of Dr. Moreau'

The story to Wells' novel begins with the protagonist (who also serves as the narrator), Edward Prendick, rescued as the only survivor of a ship that’s gone down under water. His rescuer is Montgomery, a passenger of a ship who he is assisting his employer on transporting a menagerie of wild animals to their laboratory on a remote island. Edward is stranded on the island in the two scientists’ care until another ship can come along which no one knows when that will be. It isn’t long before he discovers who Montgomery's employer is--Dr. Moreau, a criminal who has been exiled from England to the island for his cruel experimentation on animals. Not long after that, Edward finds out that Moreau is performing these experiments to speed up the evolutionary process in the animals in order to create a super-human race. 

Until he can get off the island, Edward struggles to protect his sanity from the evil of Dr. Moreau and his life from the terror of the beast people. Even after he finally does escape and return to England in the end, he is post-traumatised by the nightmarish events of the island yet learns to ease himself from them and move on with his life. 

“The Island of Dr. Moreau” is a story of both physical and psychological survival in a strange and terrifying environment separated from civilisation by the vast Pacific Ocean. Wells does a good job holding the reader's attention in the narrational structure of the story, the timing of the events and the protagonist's pre-conceptions of the mad doctor and his perverted creations. 


 

The Movie: 'Island of Lost Souls'

"Island of Lost Souls", directed by Erle C. Kenton, is faithful to the novel's basic plot. Many of the scenes of the book are recognisable in the movie. But Kenton added several more characters and changed ones from the book making the story more of a horror romance than a horror survival tale. One added character is Ruth Thomas, Edward's fiance who goes to Moreau’s island to search for him. In doing this she somewhat breaks the passive female stereotype yet she seems to have been thrown into the story as a screaming female to serve as a horror device. 

One of the changed characters is Lota the Panther woman who is basically the unnamed puma woman of the novel. In the movie she is far more human in appearance and so seems to have been written into the script as such to add another Hollywood female beauty for a male audience. Montgomery is much more level-headed and friendly than his character is in the novel in which there he is more of a disturbed person who’s always resorting to alcohol. In the movie he's also much more adverse to Moreau's evil experiments and, in being so, is more of an ally to Edward. Moreau himself is portrayed as a much more typical villain than he is in the book.. 

Edward’s surname in the film has been changed from Prendick to Parker, but more significantly there's no apparent trauma in his character like there is in the book. Much less is any post-trauma in him since the movie ends at the escape of himself, Ruth and one more person who I'm not naming so as not to create any more spoilers than I already have. 

 “Lost Souls” is an adaptation that Kenton uses a Hollywood romantic-horror formula for that simplifies the storyline. The characters and parts of the story have been changed to meet this convention that was just getting started around that time. Yet the style of the filming itself is really good. Kenton does a great job utilising Noir elements to enhance the mystery and horror. The sets are convincing for the movie's time: a dark, steaming jungle and a labyrinthine, dungeon-like "House of Pain", as the beast people call Moreau's house like they do in the book. The overall acting is also convincing and so is the makeup job on the monsters. So, it's still good viewing for any classic horror fan.


As good as Erle Kenton's "Island of Lost Souls" is at the visual level, its romanticism, simplified plot and added allies to Edward's marooned situation take away much of the psychological terror that its source material conveys. While I recommend this movie to serious viewers of classic horror, I strongly recommend reading the book at least once. It’s too good to miss!



Be here Wednesday for the monthly Insecure Writer’s Support Group blog hop! And for those of you in the US, have a Happy Fourth of July and be sure to celebrate our freedom to read and write! 

Until next time. . .

A cartoon hand with an American flag pattern making the sign of peace.
Credit: Pixabay





  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least