Skip to main content

The Artist’s Vision Vs. Corporate and Audience Expectations

A space soldier in high tech armor and holding a blaster looks across a futuristic city.
Photo Credit: Pixabay.com


I'm so behind on my upcoming short fiction collection, The Hidden. I still have several stories to revise for it, and then the cover illustration to make in which I'm planning on coming out with two versions of: a pre-release version that will be hand-made, and when I say “hand-made” I mean drawn and painted by yours truly with “old school” tools such as a pencil and coloured pencils; and the final release version which I will digitally produce. Why two versions? Personally, because I believe that digitally produced art cannot replace the natural energy and human spirit that goes into freehand art. And so I still respect and empathize with that small niche audience out there who prefer freehand art. But I don't discriminate against the majority either. If they’re willing to pay for digital, photorealistic art on book covers then I'll provide them that option, even though it’s not my thing. This reminds me of George Lucas’s issue with the Disney Company over the upcoming Star Wars film, The Force Awakens, which is less than a month away.

Lucas gave his specific reason to CBS This Morning the other day for no longer par-taking in the production of the Star Wars films. It was because Disney, who now owns the Star Wars franchise--which I think was a big mistake on Lucas's part to sell to them--wants to make the movies the “fans’” way. I really think that's, at least in part, bull shit because Disney is no longer there to satisfy anyone, including Star Wars fans; they're there to satisfy themselves with their own profits. I talked about this in one of my articles at Examiner.com a while back. You may want to take a look at it if you haven’t already done so.  Lucas's issue with the upcoming Star Wars film is a big example of how Hollywood is buying off of the fans' desires and ignoring the creator's vision.

Lucas told CBS This Morning that Star Wars is a “soap opera” rather than a space opera. He told them that “it’s not about the spaceships.” And maybe it’s not. He wants to show the development of the characters but Disney is implying fans don't want to see that. Why can't there be both “spaceships” and character and dramatic development? That's the way it happened in the prequels and that's the way it happened, even if on a more superficial level, in the original trilogy. And, needless to say, it kept drawing crowds.

Maybe Disney thought Lucas would go too far with the “soap opera” side of the movie, but so what? He may no longer own the franchise but, being the original creator, wouldn't he have a right to see some of his ideas put into the film? Disney had agreed to allow Lucas to act as consultant to the films, but if they threw out all his ideas for the 7th film then they weren’t really allowing him to carry out that role. But there you go: that’s what happens when a movie creator sells his (or her) work to a mega corporation like Disney. The corporation that purchase’s it has the legal right to do what it wants with it and, more often than not, it will.

That’s why I go the self-publishing route and not the traditional one of the big publishing houses. Too many big publishers want to basically buy writers’ stories so they can do what they want with them to make a profit for themselves. To do this often means the publishers giving readers what they want by demanding the author to make changes in the story even to the point of the author sacrificing his/her original vision. On the level of film-making, that was the problem Lucas--who did have his own vision for Star Wars--had with Disney. I would not want an editor from a big publishing house telling me to rewrite my story where it annihilates my original vision and intentions for it just because they want to buy off of readers’ desires for the sake of making profit.

Would you be willing to write your stories according to an editor’s or your fans' expectations even if it meant sacrificing your original vision that you want the story to convey? Please feel free to leave your answers in the box below.

Comments

  1. Fortunately I've not had to. None of the edits suggested by my publisher have changed anything on that level.
    What I want is decent dialogue in my Star Wars films. I think I'm finally going to get that next month.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They sound like a good publisher.

      Yeah, the Star Wars films can use better dialogue. I've heard some really poor dialogue in some of the past ones. Hopefully, if nothing else, this next movie can do better (with dialogue).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

4 Space Opera Books That’s Heroes Will Remind You of Han Solo

Credit: Pixabay.com No doubt that there’s been some big Star Wars news this week! Friday was the 41st anniversary of the first Star Wars movie, A New Hope , and so the birthday of the entire franchise. The day before, Solo: A Star Wars Story released in theatres. I haven’t seen this new Star Wars film yet but plan to tomorrow. But in celebration of the new movie I thought it would be neat to list four of my favourite space opera books that’s central characters share the same swashbuckling, rogue archetype as the Han Solo character does. Han Solo’s archetype, or primal character-type, combines traits of the cowboy, the pirate and the wandering adventurer. Characters who have these traits are often loners of a sort, are daring and don’t let the law stop them from doing what they feel they have to. Often the legal system that they defy is one that is set up by a corrupt establishment and, in the case of space operas, that establishment is often an empire. Even tho...