Skip to main content

Writing for a Living Vs. Writing for a Passion

Dr. Death: A ghoulish head wearing a top hat
Photo Credit: Openclipart.org


I apologise, but I have to postpone the cover reveal to my horror short story by two weeks. It’s been a total burn-out week, mostly from writing--particularly from writing technical subject matter. So that’s held me back. I was so burned out one day that I hardly even wrote at all. I don’t just write imaginative, high-soaring fiction. I don’t even just write fiction. Many of us freelance writers are “forced” into writing for sources that we would prefer not to. Many of those sources are ones that require technical writing. That’s what I call writing for a living as opposed to writing for a passion.

Generally speaking, there is rarely a job opening for a fiction writer, much less a fiction writer of a particular genre. There are very few ads that read “Science Fiction Writers Wanted” or “Horror Writers Wanted”, “Fantasy Writers Wanted”, “Thriller Writers Wanted”, etc. The establishment controlled by the corporate head honchos and even the head honchos of smaller businesses that are modeled after the big ones can give a shit less about who’s looking for a position as fiction writer, unless you count the many deceiving advertisements out there. They want what’s going to bring them the money. The corporations and wanna-be corporations are most in need of us freelance writers because they don’t have the time to write themselves. So we take the writing jobs we can get. Many of these jobs pay insufficiently, but we take them because if we work enough of them the payment will add up to pay off at least one of our expenses.

So that’s writing for a living, in particular. This is much different from writing for a passion (which may cross over into writing for a living, but it makes up only a small portion of our income for most of us). When you write for a passion, you write your art, not somebody else’s; you write according to your vision, not your client’s. You create your own product instead of your client’s. You create your worlds, not your clients’ whose are, more often than not, basic duplicates of this world.

But no matter what we’re writing for, we still put in our best work. Even if we get paid very little for it. Why do we do that if we’re getting under-paid? Because the very act of writing itself is ours. And when we’re using our time, energy and talent our image will be in our work when we submit that work to the client. So we want to give the best impression possible, regardless of who owns the rights to the work after we sell it. Our basic enthusiasm to write is very primal. It is an energy that is battling to get out of us, after having been locked inside our heads for so long, and put itself in front of the world regardless of subject matter. Harlan Ellison talks about doing your best writing regardless of pay in a video that I mentioned in a post a little over a year ago. He gives really good insight on the subject, so I suggest you check it out.

I apologise again, for the delay in the cover reveal and, yes, this will move the release of “Circa Sixty Years Dead” to a later date as well (probably to the week after the reveal). However, if I happen to complete the cover illustration by next weekend then I’ll definitely post it here and then will be back on schedule. The best way you can receive an update on this is by subscribing to the blog and you can do that in the form below to the right.

So, do you feel that you can write for a passion no matter what the project is or who it’s for? Or is your writing divided into passionate writing and writing for a living? Feel free to leave your answers in the box below.

Until next time . . .




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

Book-To-Movie: ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth’

Both the 1959 and the 2008 movies based on Jules Verne's novel, "Journey to the Center of the Earth", feature terrifying monsters such as the ones here in this illustration from an early edition of the book. Credit: Ã‰douard Riou/ Wikimedia Commons   Warning: This review may contain spoilers. As I said last post , I’ve postponed the month’s Book-To-Movie review from last week to this week. For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. And this weekend’s review is of Jules Verne’s novel, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” and its movie adaptations. There have been several movies based on this novel that was originally published in Paris in 1864 (as “Voyage au Centre de la Terre”). However, most of them have been either made for TV or video. Because I believe movies are best when made for the big screen, I am going to review the theatrical films in which there have been two: the 195...