Skip to main content

Self-Publishing Making Its Break!

This badge of the Insecure Writer's Support Group depicts a lighthouse in the background.


It’s time for another Insecure Writers Support Group (IWSG) post! IWSG is a monthly blog hop that occurs every first Wednesday of the month where we writers talk about the challenges in writing and how to resolve them.

A couple weeks ago, I was talking to author Derek Muk at Sinister Creature Con, a horror convention in Sacramento California. I told him I was a self-published author. He asked me if I thought self-publishing still gets looked down on compared to traditional publishing. I thought for a moment. Then I said that it does but less so than when it first came onto the internet scene in the 1990s. In a way, like many of the authors themselves who have gone that route, self-publishing is making its break!

I told Muk that self-published books are still not taken seriously by the majority of critics and avid readers since most of the works on the New York Times best sellers’ list come from traditional publishers such as Random House and DAW. But self-published books are getting more acknowledgment than they did 10 years ago. They’re being acknowledged by both nationwide and worldwide organizations such as the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America and the Horror Writers Association. Traditional award committees—committees that have mostly considered traditionally published work for awards--are beginning to accept self-published work. Two of these are the Hugo Award and National Book Award committees. Not only this, but traditional publishers are offering to buy the rights to self-published books such as with author Susan Allain’s novel, Mr. Malcolm’s List! So self-published works aren’t as ghettoed as they used to be.

One of the longest standing pros of self-publishing is the freedom for the author to make his or her work the way they want. Along with this is the freedom to publish one’s own work to begin with without having to be at the mercy of a traditional publisher’s editor, who will accept only what the majority of consumers will buy. However, newer pros are: more opportunity for awards; prestigious literary membership; and, ironically, offers from traditional publishers. Speaking about irony, this third one is beneficial if you’re willing to give up your freedom as an author. However, some traditional publishing companies may take a self-published book without demanding major changes to it if they’re impressed with it enough. So always ask them about the details of the offer, including the conditions on which they will purchase the book. Ideally, get an attorney to look over the details with you.


A cartoon depiction of a rocket flying through space.
Credit: Pixabay.com


For those in the U.S., celebrate your freedom as a writer and reader this Independence Day! Have a Happy and Safe Fourth of July!

For those who are elsewhere in the world or don’t celebrate the holiday, always celebrate yourself as a writer and reader anyway, because writing and reading are two of the greatest gifts given to the human race!


Today’s IWSG is brought to you by these super co-hosts: Erika Beebe, Natalie Aguirre, Jennifer Lane, MJ Fifield, Lisa Buie-Collard, and Ellen @ The Cynical Sailor! IWSG was founded by awesome author Alex Cavanaugh, writer of the Cassa Series of novels.!

Until next time . . .



Comments

  1. I'm not self-published, but it certainly gives authors more advantages. I've read enough books to know there is crap on both sides, which places them even to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I've seen crap on both sides too, so I agree. To broaden my chances even more, though, I'm going both ways: traditional publishing for short stories and self-publishing for books.

      Delete
  2. Celebrate yourself as a writer? Yes! It's cool that we can bypass the gate keepers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It definitely makes publishing one''s work way easier. Getting people to see that work is a different story.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least