Skip to main content

Self-Publishing Making Its Break!

This badge of the Insecure Writer's Support Group depicts a lighthouse in the background.


It’s time for another Insecure Writers Support Group (IWSG) post! IWSG is a monthly blog hop that occurs every first Wednesday of the month where we writers talk about the challenges in writing and how to resolve them.

A couple weeks ago, I was talking to author Derek Muk at Sinister Creature Con, a horror convention in Sacramento California. I told him I was a self-published author. He asked me if I thought self-publishing still gets looked down on compared to traditional publishing. I thought for a moment. Then I said that it does but less so than when it first came onto the internet scene in the 1990s. In a way, like many of the authors themselves who have gone that route, self-publishing is making its break!

I told Muk that self-published books are still not taken seriously by the majority of critics and avid readers since most of the works on the New York Times best sellers’ list come from traditional publishers such as Random House and DAW. But self-published books are getting more acknowledgment than they did 10 years ago. They’re being acknowledged by both nationwide and worldwide organizations such as the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America and the Horror Writers Association. Traditional award committees—committees that have mostly considered traditionally published work for awards--are beginning to accept self-published work. Two of these are the Hugo Award and National Book Award committees. Not only this, but traditional publishers are offering to buy the rights to self-published books such as with author Susan Allain’s novel, Mr. Malcolm’s List! So self-published works aren’t as ghettoed as they used to be.

One of the longest standing pros of self-publishing is the freedom for the author to make his or her work the way they want. Along with this is the freedom to publish one’s own work to begin with without having to be at the mercy of a traditional publisher’s editor, who will accept only what the majority of consumers will buy. However, newer pros are: more opportunity for awards; prestigious literary membership; and, ironically, offers from traditional publishers. Speaking about irony, this third one is beneficial if you’re willing to give up your freedom as an author. However, some traditional publishing companies may take a self-published book without demanding major changes to it if they’re impressed with it enough. So always ask them about the details of the offer, including the conditions on which they will purchase the book. Ideally, get an attorney to look over the details with you.


A cartoon depiction of a rocket flying through space.
Credit: Pixabay.com


For those in the U.S., celebrate your freedom as a writer and reader this Independence Day! Have a Happy and Safe Fourth of July!

For those who are elsewhere in the world or don’t celebrate the holiday, always celebrate yourself as a writer and reader anyway, because writing and reading are two of the greatest gifts given to the human race!


Today’s IWSG is brought to you by these super co-hosts: Erika Beebe, Natalie Aguirre, Jennifer Lane, MJ Fifield, Lisa Buie-Collard, and Ellen @ The Cynical Sailor! IWSG was founded by awesome author Alex Cavanaugh, writer of the Cassa Series of novels.!

Until next time . . .



Comments

  1. I'm not self-published, but it certainly gives authors more advantages. I've read enough books to know there is crap on both sides, which places them even to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I've seen crap on both sides too, so I agree. To broaden my chances even more, though, I'm going both ways: traditional publishing for short stories and self-publishing for books.

      Delete
  2. Celebrate yourself as a writer? Yes! It's cool that we can bypass the gate keepers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It definitely makes publishing one''s work way easier. Getting people to see that work is a different story.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

Book-To-Movie: ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth’

Both the 1959 and the 2008 movies based on Jules Verne's novel, "Journey to the Center of the Earth", feature terrifying monsters such as the ones here in this illustration from an early edition of the book. Credit: Ã‰douard Riou/ Wikimedia Commons   Warning: This review may contain spoilers. As I said last post , I’ve postponed the month’s Book-To-Movie review from last week to this week. For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. And this weekend’s review is of Jules Verne’s novel, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” and its movie adaptations. There have been several movies based on this novel that was originally published in Paris in 1864 (as “Voyage au Centre de la Terre”). However, most of them have been either made for TV or video. Because I believe movies are best when made for the big screen, I am going to review the theatrical films in which there have been two: the 195...