Skip to main content

Self-Publishing Making Its Break!

This badge of the Insecure Writer's Support Group depicts a lighthouse in the background.


It’s time for another Insecure Writers Support Group (IWSG) post! IWSG is a monthly blog hop that occurs every first Wednesday of the month where we writers talk about the challenges in writing and how to resolve them.

A couple weeks ago, I was talking to author Derek Muk at Sinister Creature Con, a horror convention in Sacramento California. I told him I was a self-published author. He asked me if I thought self-publishing still gets looked down on compared to traditional publishing. I thought for a moment. Then I said that it does but less so than when it first came onto the internet scene in the 1990s. In a way, like many of the authors themselves who have gone that route, self-publishing is making its break!

I told Muk that self-published books are still not taken seriously by the majority of critics and avid readers since most of the works on the New York Times best sellers’ list come from traditional publishers such as Random House and DAW. But self-published books are getting more acknowledgment than they did 10 years ago. They’re being acknowledged by both nationwide and worldwide organizations such as the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America and the Horror Writers Association. Traditional award committees—committees that have mostly considered traditionally published work for awards--are beginning to accept self-published work. Two of these are the Hugo Award and National Book Award committees. Not only this, but traditional publishers are offering to buy the rights to self-published books such as with author Susan Allain’s novel, Mr. Malcolm’s List! So self-published works aren’t as ghettoed as they used to be.

One of the longest standing pros of self-publishing is the freedom for the author to make his or her work the way they want. Along with this is the freedom to publish one’s own work to begin with without having to be at the mercy of a traditional publisher’s editor, who will accept only what the majority of consumers will buy. However, newer pros are: more opportunity for awards; prestigious literary membership; and, ironically, offers from traditional publishers. Speaking about irony, this third one is beneficial if you’re willing to give up your freedom as an author. However, some traditional publishing companies may take a self-published book without demanding major changes to it if they’re impressed with it enough. So always ask them about the details of the offer, including the conditions on which they will purchase the book. Ideally, get an attorney to look over the details with you.


A cartoon depiction of a rocket flying through space.
Credit: Pixabay.com


For those in the U.S., celebrate your freedom as a writer and reader this Independence Day! Have a Happy and Safe Fourth of July!

For those who are elsewhere in the world or don’t celebrate the holiday, always celebrate yourself as a writer and reader anyway, because writing and reading are two of the greatest gifts given to the human race!


Today’s IWSG is brought to you by these super co-hosts: Erika Beebe, Natalie Aguirre, Jennifer Lane, MJ Fifield, Lisa Buie-Collard, and Ellen @ The Cynical Sailor! IWSG was founded by awesome author Alex Cavanaugh, writer of the Cassa Series of novels.!

Until next time . . .



Comments

  1. I'm not self-published, but it certainly gives authors more advantages. I've read enough books to know there is crap on both sides, which places them even to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I've seen crap on both sides too, so I agree. To broaden my chances even more, though, I'm going both ways: traditional publishing for short stories and self-publishing for books.

      Delete
  2. Celebrate yourself as a writer? Yes! It's cool that we can bypass the gate keepers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It definitely makes publishing one''s work way easier. Getting people to see that work is a different story.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least...

Book-To-Movie: Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Black Cat'

Credit: Wikimedia Commons It's another fourth Monday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie (BTM), we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. A few years back, we had a BTM for Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Black Cat" and its movie adaptation. However, the movie we reviewed was actually a segment in Roger Corman’s anthology film, "Tales of Terror", which features three of Poe's short stories, including "Black Cat". And I'll tell you now, I liked that version far more than the version that we're going to review today which is the 1934 Universal adaptation starring Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff. I like Corman's version better mostly because it stays more faithful to the original short story than Universal's does. However, even though Universal's "Black Cat", directed by Edgar Ulmer, strays (excuse the pun) far from Poe's short stor...

Book-To-Movie: ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth’

Both the 1959 and the 2008 movies based on Jules Verne's novel, "Journey to the Center of the Earth", feature terrifying monsters such as the ones here in this illustration from an early edition of the book. Credit: Ã‰douard Riou/ Wikimedia Commons   Warning: This review may contain spoilers. As I said last post , I’ve postponed the month’s Book-To-Movie review from last week to this week. For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. And this weekend’s review is of Jules Verne’s novel, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” and its movie adaptations. There have been several movies based on this novel that was originally published in Paris in 1864 (as “Voyage au Centre de la Terre”). However, most of them have been either made for TV or video. Because I believe movies are best when made for the big screen, I am going to review the theatrical films in which there have been two: the 195...