Skip to main content

Lovecraft’s ‘Mythos’ Needs To Be In More Movies

The monster, Cthulhu, from H. P. Lovecraft's fiction.
Credit: Pixabay.com

When I found out this week that a film adaptation of Color Out of Space will be premiering in September,  I thought, “Finally, a film based on one of Lovecraft’s horror novels is coming to the big screen!” And I was right! Only it was the big screen at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). A little far for me, a Northern Californian, to go to see a sci fi horror flick! Still, the movie will star big name actor Nicolas Cage and is directed by Richard Stanley. Hopefully the fact that a famous actor such as Cage being in the movie will help it get the praise that film adaptations of Lovecraft’s stories have been lacking. So what if Cage’s Ghost Rider flopped at the box office? (I actually thought that often overlooked Marvel film was really good.)


Lovecraft’s work deserves film adaptations of critical praise because he has had a big influence on horror fiction as we know it today. His work is credited as starting the sub-genre that has been fairly recently coined as “cosmic horror”. Cosmic horror,  sometimes called Lovecraftian horror or Lovecraftian fiction, is sci fi horror that conveys a dread of realising that we humans are not as significant or as powerful of a species as we think and that there is a bigger, more powerful intelligent species in the universe.

Cosmic horror influenced speculative pulp fiction authors in the 1930s and ‘40s, such as John Campbell, and would later influence more contemporary horror fiction authors such as Stephen King and Charles Stross. In fact, Stross’s work often makes direct references to Lovecraft’s “Mythos” (fictional world) especially in his Laundry Files series of novels which cleverly mix espionage with sci fi horror. In turn, the cosmic horror of pulp fiction led to the sci fi horror films of the 1950s. Many of these movies featured gargantuan monsters that result from the mutatational effects of the atom bomb while others speculated the potential dangers of the unknown reaches of space.

There have been plenty of obscure, indie films based on Lovecraft’s ‘Mythos’ but none that have been awarded even nationwide fame. Only a few movies based on his work made it to momentary popularity and they were at the b-rated level. One in 1963 starred Vincent Price and Lon Chaney Jr., an adaptation of “The Case of Charles Dexter Ward” but was mis-titled The Haunted Palace which was a poem by Edgar Allen Poe. Another movie came along about two years later called Die Monster Die, starring Boris Karloff, and was actually based on Color Out of Space.

These movies, however, did not get the acclaim that others based on other classic works such as Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein and Bram Stoker’s Dracula did.  More recently, Guillermo Del Toro had a film adaptation of Lovecraft’s novella, The Mountains of Madness, in the plans for several years but it has not yet followed through.


Hopefully, Stanley’s Color Out of Space will get the acclaim that it needs at the TIFF to distribute to major movie theaters. If that happens, it may finally bring another monster to Hollywood (or “Horrorwood”) fame like Universal did with Frankenstein and Dracula.

If you haven’t visited the latest Insecure Writers Support Group post here at the Fantastic Site please do so, especially if you’re a writer looking for tips and advice.

Do you think Hollywood has traditionally under-rated H.P. Lovecraft’s stories and characters unlike with Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or Bram Stoker’s Dracula? Please feel free to leave your answers or other comments in the box below.

Until next time . . .

Comments

  1. Most of the movie adaptations have been small films and not very good. The Resurrected was a decent on though - Chris Sarandon played Charles Dexter Ward. One big budget film was In the Mouth of Madness with Sam Neill - had promise then fell apart. And Color Our of Space was adapted into a movie - it was called The Curse and starred Wil Wheaton. Also not very good. So it will be interesting to see how the upcoming movie handles the story.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, it will be interesting. However, since it's one being presented at a film festival that I believe mostly screens indie films I have a big feeling it won't get the praise it needs in order to make it to movie theatres at least nationwide. But who really knows? If I remember correctly, Pan's Labyrinth started as an indie film and then made it big enough to be shown in theatres all over and several years before that Halloween was in a similar scenario. There are a lot of great indie films out there it's just that many are ones that Hollywood isn't willing to buy but ones that I would watch way over certain blockbusters. So there's really no certainty where a movie will go in terms of acceptance. I've heard of The Resurrected but didn't know it was based on a Lovecraft story when it came out. I'll have to check out that one for sure. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

Book-To-Movie: Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Black Cat'

Credit: Wikimedia Commons It's another fourth Monday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie (BTM), we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. A few years back, we had a BTM for Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Black Cat" and its movie adaptation. However, the movie we reviewed was actually a segment in Roger Corman’s anthology film, "Tales of Terror", which features three of Poe's short stories, including "Black Cat". And I'll tell you now, I liked that version far more than the version that we're going to review today which is the 1934 Universal adaptation starring Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff. I like Corman's version better mostly because it stays more faithful to the original short story than Universal's does. However, even though Universal's "Black Cat", directed by Edgar Ulmer, strays (excuse the pun) far from Poe's short stor...