Skip to main content

What Goes There? The Promo Poster to John Carpenter’s ‘The Thing’

A shadowy gargantuan monster stands in a wintery haze, a scene reminiscent of the sci fi horror movie "The Thing".
Credit: Pixabay


I’m admitting it straight out: I hate John Carpenter’s “The Thing”. I always have. This remake of the 1950s original, which bears the slightly different title of “The Thing From Another World”, is based on John Campbell Jr.’s sci fi horror novella, “Who Goes There?”. Carpenter’s movie came across to me as more gore exploitation than anything. Regardless of that, I liked the movie’s promo poster. 

I first saw this poster in the summer of 1982, when the movie released. I was 11-going-on-12 and with my parents and younger brother travelling around the Los Angeles area (we had just moved to Fresno). The poster depicted a monstrous, shadowed out, humanoid figure, beams of cold white light seeming to radiate from the center of its face, set against a dark arctic background. This poster was all over Los Angeles: on the benches of the bus stops, on the freeway billboards, and definitely on buildings throughout its place of production, Universal Studios (which my brother and I had visited for the first time). I was fascinated with the poster.

Yet I didn’t dare ask my parents to take me to see the movie. This wasn’t only because I knew they wouldn’t but because my little pre-teen mind knew seeing it would give me nightmares for life. But that poster alone made me wonder what kind of monster was in the movie and made me guess that it was a monster that was pretty horrible. That’s why I was kind of upset when an article at ScreenRant earlier this week revealed what the shadowy figure was supposed to be or more like who it was supposed to be. In case you’re like me and you prefer the mystery in art, I will only say that the article revealed it to be one of the human characters in the film.

Reactions like mine say how great of a job artist Drew Struzan did making the poster even though, according to the ScreenRant article, he did so in a rush of 24 hours. When an artist of any type--whether a promo artist for movies, a book illustrator, or a fine artist (gallery artist)--puts mystery into their work by holding back certain details such as features in the subject matter’s face, it makes the observer question the event being depicted. It also makes them come up with possible answers to those questions.

In the case of horror art the question often is something like “What’s going to happen?” And the speculated answer often is, “Probably something horrible.” If it’s an illustration on the cover of a book or on a movie poster, it’s most likely to do one of two things: 1) make the observer want to find out how horrifying the story will be, or 2) repel her from purchasing the book or an admission ticket because she’s too scared to find out how horrifying it will be. The latter is mostly the case with non-horror fans.

The promo poster for Carpenter’s “Thing” (among other, uh, things) also made me want to be a writer of horror. It made me want to write about the mysteries of the dark side of life, that side full of forces and events that are often forbidden to be seen or engaged with in real life and so makes us ask “Who (or what) goes there?” So, like great horror art such as with Struzan’s poster, great horror fiction does the same. When certain details are left out of a horror story, especially at the end, it makes the reader ask “What happened?” or “What’s going to happen?” And it makes him answer his question speculatively with something such as “The monster will probably devour the world.” It leaves that question and possible answer on the reader’s mind for a long time making him glad the situation isn’t occurring in the real world and probably never will.

So, even though I could never stand John Carpenter’s movie, “The Thing”, the art of the promo poster alone did a lot for me. It made me ask questions about the terrifying situation it depicts. It made me speculate answers to those questions. And, as a writer of horror, it’s made me ask similar questions so readers can hopefully ask those kinds of questions like “What goes there?”

Do you think less details in horror storytelling can make the reader think more about the story?

Until next time . . .

A promo poster to the 1951 sci fi horror film, "The Thing From Another World", depicts the first two words of the title in blood style lettering.
Credit: Wikimedia Commons/RKO Radio Pictures


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Andromeda Strain’

Credit: Pixabay.com To find out how you can read this post without ads, visit my Patreon page !   It’s time for our monthly Book-To-Movie ! For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. Today we are reviewing another book and film relevant to today’s pandemic: Michael Crichton’s novel, “The Andromeda Strain” and its 1971 movie adaptation. Crichton  is the writer of suspenseful science fiction, what would commonly be called today, science fiction thriller. “The Andromeda Strain” is exactly that. However, as good as this novel is, the suspense in the movie adaptation plays out better.  The Book In “The Andromeda Strain”, published in 1969, a NASA satellite returns to Earth carrying an alien virus. It lands in a small Arizona town by the name of Piedmont where the virus infects and kills everyone except an old man and an infant. A team of four scientists go to a top secret lab in Nevad...

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Lawnmower Man’

Credit: Pixabay Warning: This review may contain spoilers. In past Book-To-Movies, we’ve reviewed several movie adaptations of books and short stories by famous science fiction and horror authors. All those films have stuck to the plot of the original work to at least some recognizable degree. But this week’s Book-To-Movie will be the first to review a film that does a poor job of staying faithful to the original plot. The film is 1992’s “The Lawnmower Man” which is based on Stephen King’s short story of the same name. Even so, the movie is a really good one. So then what’s the problem? The problem is that it’s hardly an adaptation and so more its own story simply with the title of King’s short work slapped onto it.  ‘The Lawnmower Man’: The Short Story Stephen King’s “The Lawnmower Man” originally appeared in “Cavalier” magazine in 1975 and was then collected into his book of short fiction, “Night Shift” the following year. The story’s protagonist is a middle-aged husband and dad ...

4 Space Opera Books That’s Heroes Will Remind You of Han Solo

Credit: Pixabay.com No doubt that there’s been some big Star Wars news this week! Friday was the 41st anniversary of the first Star Wars movie, A New Hope , and so the birthday of the entire franchise. The day before, Solo: A Star Wars Story released in theatres. I haven’t seen this new Star Wars film yet but plan to tomorrow. But in celebration of the new movie I thought it would be neat to list four of my favourite space opera books that’s central characters share the same swashbuckling, rogue archetype as the Han Solo character does. Han Solo’s archetype, or primal character-type, combines traits of the cowboy, the pirate and the wandering adventurer. Characters who have these traits are often loners of a sort, are daring and don’t let the law stop them from doing what they feel they have to. Often the legal system that they defy is one that is set up by a corrupt establishment and, in the case of space operas, that establishment is often an empire. Even tho...