Skip to main content

Sticking To My Genres and Forms In My Fiction Writing

Logo of the Insecure Writer's Support Group with a lighthouse in the background.


It’s the first Wednesday of the month and so it’s time for another Insecure Writers Support Group (IWSG) post! In an IWSG post, we writers bring our writing challenges and problems out into the open to share with each other and try to offer solutions.

This month’s question comes with a quote: "Although I have written a short story collection, the form found me and not the other way around. Don't write short stories, novels or poems. Just write your truth and your stories will mold into the shapes they need to be."

And the question: Have you ever written a piece that became a form, or even a genre, you hadn't planned on writing in? Or do you choose a form/genre in advance?

Strangely, a similar experience happened to me just recently with the short story I’ve been trying to revise off and on. It’s one of the most challenging that I’ve written because it deals with an alternate universe, which is a topic that gets into quantum theoretical complications and I am not a science expert. Science enthusiast of a sort, but no where near an expert. So I am now going on to my fourth rewrite of this short story. During my third I had discovered that the plot was calling for a longer form of fiction, at least novella size. However, I didn’t want to write this story as a novella, especially since I’m already working on a novella and didn’t want to be working on two simultaneously.
 
So I made a new outline for the story and rewrote it from a more simpler standpoint of the protagonist (who is not a scientist). To do this, I had to distance him more from the supporting character, a physicist. So, in order for the story to develop more simplistically for what I can handle in a short work, I had to shift the story to focus more on the protagonist’s relationship and encounter with the antagonist rather than with the supporting physicist character. In my specific situation this seems like it will help keep the story to the short fiction level like I want. 

To elaborate on and respond to the above quote more, since I am a big lover of genre literature, I have to disagree with the quote’s suggestion to ignore genre or form. I have to know what I’m writing ahead of time, at least vaguely (e.g. Am I writing science fiction? Horror?). Besides, I normally write a story based on an idea I have recorded in my journal and the idea is usually already in the form of science fiction, fantasy or horror. So, when I start writing a fiction story I already have the idea for it and it’s usually already determined by a specified genre often due to the nature of the plot. Maybe that’s because my thoughts are science fiction and fantasy to begin with.

Do you already have your genre in mind when you begin to write (e.g. science fiction, romance)? What about your form of writing (e.g. novel, short story, poem)?

Today’s IWSG is brought to you by these super co-hosts: Susan Baury Rouchard, Nancy Gideon, Jennifer Lane, Jennifer Hawes, Chemist Ken, and Chrys Fey!! IWSG was founded by awesome author Alex Cavanaugh, writer of the Cassa Series of novels! 

Until next time . . .


Comments

  1. I wouldn't be able to write a ton of science into a story either.
    I always know what I am writing ahead of time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to at least have a basic idea of what I'm writing ahead of time. The details come from exploration into the story for me.

      Delete
  2. I always know the genre the story belongs to before I even start writing. But not the length, which emerges as the story unfolds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree--about knowing what you're writing first. Each genre has such unique rules/guidelines. You have to follow them (or know why you aren't) to succeed in that genre.

    Interesting post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jacqui. Have you happened to have read anything by Mary Mackey? She writes, or did when I attended a fiction writing course of hers in college years ago, prehistoric fiction much of which seems to be on the more fact-based side. (I can't say for sure because I haven't read any of her work myself.)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least...

Book-To-Movie: Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Black Cat'

Credit: Wikimedia Commons It's another fourth Monday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie (BTM), we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. A few years back, we had a BTM for Edgar Allan Poe's short story "The Black Cat" and its movie adaptation. However, the movie we reviewed was actually a segment in Roger Corman’s anthology film, "Tales of Terror", which features three of Poe's short stories, including "Black Cat". And I'll tell you now, I liked that version far more than the version that we're going to review today which is the 1934 Universal adaptation starring Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff. I like Corman's version better mostly because it stays more faithful to the original short story than Universal's does. However, even though Universal's "Black Cat", directed by Edgar Ulmer, strays (excuse the pun) far from Poe's short stor...

Book-To-Movie: ‘Journey to the Center of the Earth’

Both the 1959 and the 2008 movies based on Jules Verne's novel, "Journey to the Center of the Earth", feature terrifying monsters such as the ones here in this illustration from an early edition of the book. Credit: Ã‰douard Riou/ Wikimedia Commons   Warning: This review may contain spoilers. As I said last post , I’ve postponed the month’s Book-To-Movie review from last week to this week. For those of you who are just tuning into this blog, a Book-To-Movie is when we review a work of prose fiction and its movie adaptation. And this weekend’s review is of Jules Verne’s novel, “Journey to the Center of the Earth” and its movie adaptations. There have been several movies based on this novel that was originally published in Paris in 1864 (as “Voyage au Centre de la Terre”). However, most of them have been either made for TV or video. Because I believe movies are best when made for the big screen, I am going to review the theatrical films in which there have been two: the 195...