Credit: Pixabay.com |
Most of us have our childhood memories of sitting in a warm, dark
movie theater on a cold weekend afternoon during the holiday season,
watching a movie that really impressed us. One of the memories that
stand out most for me was when I saw Star Trek the Motion Picture
when it released during the Christmas season of 1979. I hated it. But
still, it impressed me with it’s cinematography and special effects
likened to those of Star Wars, the
movie that Motion Picture’s
producers were competing with during that space opera craze. I would
come to actually like this film several years later, especially when
I got into my Star Trek fan phase in high school. In fact, and
I don’t care if anyone attempts to stone me for it, it’s my
favourite of the Star Trek movies for reasons that I’m not
going to go into here. But perhaps, one very tiny reason is
nostalgia. And for the past
three holiday seasons we’ve had Star Wars films
releasing which will probably be memorable to many kids when they get
older. However, this holiday season the flick that a kid just might
get a childhood memory from when he or she grows up may be the new
post-apocalyptic sci fi movie--Mortal Engines.
I haven’t seen
Mortal Engines myself yet but am going to try this weekend.
That’s regardless of, like with Star Trek the Motion Picture
more than 30 years ago, critics saying that it’s a flop. But those
can mostly be general film critics for all we know. Us sci fi/fantasy
nerds often have different, more open-minded, standards when it comes
to judging films of our genre. I can’t yet say exactly why this
movie is that great but of what I’ve seen in the trailers the
cinematography is far out fantastic! The movie’s based on Philip
Reeve’s YA book of the same name. It’s directed by Peter Jackson,
director of the Lord of
the Rings and Hobbit films. As in the original book, the
story is set on a post-apocalyptic earth in the distant future
when society has regressed back to diesel industrial age technology
and cities are on the go—literally. They are mobile and so travel
on tracks similar to railroads. One of these cities is preying on and
destroying whatever is in it’s path and a group of young rebels
attempts to stop it.
Usually I try to
look at both reviews that give a movie a bad rating and ones that
give it a good rating. Then I decide whether the movie’s worth
paying 8 to 10 bucks to see on the big screen. The reviews that give
Mortal Engines a bad rating are definitely easy to find. Just
go to Rotten Tomatoes, that gave it an overall “rotten” rating,
and look at its list of review links. But if you want a critic’s
opinion about why this movie may be so good, an opinion that is well
thought out and supported by referencing scenes and details from the
film and book, I recommend reading Mike Perschon’s review at his
blog, the Steampunk Scholar.
If Mortal Engines
doesn’t turn out to be that good of a film that at least a science
fiction critic can give a good rating, and so if it truly is a flop
rather than a movie among the many underrated sci fi movies,
maybe something good about it will stay in our heads to remember this
holiday season by. Even if that something is only the cinematography
and special effects.
Is Mortal Engines
a movie you’re willing to give a try this holiday season?
Until next time . .
.
Credit: Pixabay.com |
We thought about seeing it last weekend but opted for the new Spider-Man film instead. Wise choice - one of the best films I've seen all year. (I reviewed it today.)
ReplyDeleteThe first Star Trek was rather awful, although the fifth one might challenge it for the worst.
I would maybe go see the mew SM movie but I believe they're based on many of the newer Spidey super heroes? And I haven't read any of their comics. The fifth ST was the worst I've seen. I haven't watched it since it released in theaters back in 1989 (I believe it was?) and I don't plan to waste my time with it again.
ReplyDelete