Skip to main content

TV Review: George R.R. Martin’s ‘Nightflyers’

A corridor in a spaceship.
Credit: Pixabay.com




Last post I talked about Nightflyers, the new science fiction-horror TV miniseries based on George R.R. Martin’s novella of the same name. As much as I said I was looking forward to its premiere episode, I didn’t watch it. That is, I didn’t watch it on its premiere night which was last Sunday. It was on in my area at 10 and I normally try going to bed before that time on Sunday nights. So I taped it on my old TV-VCR-in-one and finally watched the debut episode last night. (No, I don’t have a DVR.)

The debut episode came across well as the science fiction-horror that the novella was made to be. It would be a 100 percent slasher-in-space if violent gore was at the centre of this series in which so far it isn’t. What is at the centre is a power that kills people and is hiding on the spaceship. Like all great science fiction-horror, the setting is fitting. The series takes place on a colony ship called the Nightflyer which is dark and gigantic yet claustrophobic in it’s interior much like the Nostromo in Alien. The episode provided plenty of suspense and good pacing of the movement of events. It opened good in introducing the conflict: the ship’s biologist has gone psycho and is swinging an axe, chasing the ship’s psychiatrist. Then the story goes back to the beginning of events to unfold its way to show what started the killing spree which, of course, we won’t know the complete cause until the end of the series. So the opening scene serves as a kind of preview of coming attractions. The biologist isn’t the only one that goes psychotic on board the ship, by the way, and so the terror doesn’t end at the beginning. You can take comfort in that.

As with many of today’s science fiction and horror TV series’s episodes, Nightflyers Episode 1 ends leaving the viewer in suspense, in this case with a cliffhanger. I definitely have no problem with cliffhangers, in fact, I like them. The problem that I do have with TV series that’s episodes leave off at suspenseful points is when they are too dependent on doing so. When they’re too dependent on the suspenseful ending, they often drop off with out any kind of conclusion which this episode does.  Of course, the episode can’t have too solid of a conclusion since the series is built on a continuous story line. The problem is that it doesn’t have a satisfying conclusion on the subplot level. Because of this nothing is resolved and so there is no sense of completion. An ending like this is a big let-down to the audience because it’s making viewers want to watch the next episode and so is serving not much more as a marketing gimmick. Hopefully it won’t be that way with every episode in this series.

Most everything else about Nightflyers, so far, is done well. The characterization is okay and believable enough, the visual and sound effects are good considering that it’s a television show, and the story presents itself clearly.

Nightflyers is airs Sunday through Thursday, 10 PM/9PM Central on the SyFy Channel. If you miss an episode or the show’s scheduled time slot doesn’t work for you then record it on DVR or, if you’re a vintage rat pack like me, VCR. Or you can watch for free past episodes streamed at SyFy.com!

Have you been watching Nightflyers? If so, what do you think of it so far?

Until next time . . .



Comments

  1. I watched the first two episodes for free on YouTube and was hooked. It does have its gore moments further on since it is a hybrid haunted house tale. Thanks for visiting my blog and caring enough to comment. :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No problem, Roland. Thank you for doing the same with my blog. I'll be watching the second episode only tonight (since I'm often too busy throughout the week to watch them all at once) and I can hardly wait!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book-To-Movie: ‘The Hound of the Baskervilles’

Credit: Wikimedia Commons I apologise for posting outside our regular post-day which is late Saturday night/early Sunday morning. However, I got behind on several things last week and so had to postpone the post to today.  I’ve been a reader of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes books ever since I was 11. What I’ve always liked so much about the series is that, like a good horror story, the stories often take place in dark settings and involve bizarre cases. Conan Doyle’s novel, “The Hound of the Baskervilles”, definitely contains these elements. It’s a detective story that crosses over into the gothic horror genre. Several movie adaptations of the novel have been made that go as far back as a 1915 German silent film. In 1959 Hammer Studios released a version starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee. As much as I’m a fan of the Hammer horror films, I have not seen that one yet. The only one that I’ve seen so far is the 1939 adaptation starring that other big name in classic Bri

Book-To-Movie: ‘I Am Legend’

A vampire similar to the ones in 2008's "I Am Legend" which starred Will Smith. Credit: Pixabay.com It’s time for another Book-To-Movie review! In a Book-To-Movie, I review a book and its movie adaptations. This month’s book and its movies based on it is I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. While vampires were no longer in in the American pop culture of the the 1950s, science fiction horror in general was. So Matheson’s I Am Legend brought the scientificising of vampires into the pulp literary scene of that era. Not too long after, in the early ‘60s, the first of three book-to-movie adaptions appeared and was renamed The Last Man On Earth which starred Vincent Price. The other two were The Omega Man starring Charlton Heston in the ‘70s and I Am Legend starring Will Smith in the 2001s. Even though each one debunked the myth of the vampire as a supernatural being, each had its own depiction of the creature. ‘I Am Legend’, The Book Set in a near post-apocalyptic fu

Book-To-Movie: Stephen King’s 'The Raft'

Credit: Pixabay.com It's the third Saturday of the month and so that means it's time for another Book-To-Movie ! In a Book-To-Movie we review a book and its movie adaptation. One of the reasons I as a horror fan don’t read a lot of Stephen King’s work is because most of it consists of novels that go more than 400 pages. I have a short attention span when it comes to reading, ironically since I consider myself an avid reader, and so I normally won’t read a work that is much more than the equivalent to a 350-page mass market paperback. The other reason why I don’t read a lot of King’s work is that, as literary scholars will tell you, a lot of his writing is poor. However, he does have some good writing in his works, especially his earlier stuff, including his short horror tales. So if I read anything by Stephen King it’s usually his short stories or novellas. One of his collections I’ve read is Skeleton Crew which includes some of his good, or at least better, fi